- ISBN13: 9780969527213
- Condition: NEW
- Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
Flax Oil As a True Aid Against Arthritis Heart Infarction Cancer and Other Diseases
-
Recent Posts
- Thermacare Joint & Arthritis (12Hr.) 2-Count Boxes (Pack Of 2) for $8.49
- Zilactin Tooth And Gum Instant Pain Reliever – 8 Ea
- Bio-Dynamix Compression Knee Support, X-Small for $9.50
- Therabeads Therabeadsneck Pain Relief – Bulk, White, One for $19.98
- Silver Stainless Steel Link Magnetic Bracelet #26S 8″
Recent Comments
- Mr WordPress on Hello world!
- m3tallih0lic on Cure for rheumatoid arthritis?
- m3tallih0lic on Cure for rheumatoid arthritis?
- katieshealinggarden on Cure for rheumatoid arthritis?
- A1canc on Cure for rheumatoid arthritis?
Archives
Categories
Meta
The people who say “it makes so much sense” probably have forgotten any science they learned in school. The book is so rife with errors I’ll just mention a couple. One of the biggest pieces of nonsense is the promotion of “electron-rich foods. ” All matter has the same amount of electrons as it does protons, otherwise it would carry a static electric charge. “It is the human being, with his gradual concentration of electrons, ever striving towards the future, who conceals within himself the greatest potential for the sun’s energy on earth. “A way to get a gradual concentration of electrons is to shuffle your shoes against a carpet when the weather is dry. That will generally cause a small accumulation of electrons unbalanced by protons. When you get close enough to a conductor such a doorknob or another person there is a shock as the excess electrons jump to the body with the lesser excess charge. Imagine a larger “concentration of electrons. “”Thus, the human who eats refined foodstuffs or food which lacks electron. . . . ” No food could lack electrons, that is physically impossible. It can’t even have a relative lack of electrons, or it would be electrically charged, like static cling from the dryer, or worse. Her characterization of all cancer is patently false: “the only substance which characterised the cancerous cells, as opposed to healthy ones, was isolated fat; the formation of fat in the cell nucleus, cell body and cytoplasm. It was the single distinguishing feature of cancerous cells in contrast to healthy ones. “That is certainly not accepted today. Cancer is much more complicated than that. You can read more information at the NCI site cancer. gov. I do sympathize with those who are desperate for help. But the whole theory that this book is based on is utter nonsense. The late Dr. Budwig seems to have believed in her theory, but there have been no controlled studies, even retrospective studies, looking at groups of patients who either did or did not go on the Budwig diet. I can’t say the diet is nonsense, but the ideas behind it certainly are.
Rating: 1 / 5
Don’t believe that any one particular oil is a cure all for life’s ailments. There are so many factors – genetics, environment, diet, bad habits, exercise, exposure to toxins, etc. , that all contribute to health or illness. Heck, mental attitude and your outlook on life are also major factors.
Rating: 3 / 5
Great book with very helpful information. And seller delivered as promised. The book was in excellent condition.
Rating: 5 / 5
The idea with flax is not exactly new. Still important and worth considering. Good book.
Rating: 4 / 5
Great post. It is clear You have a great deal of unused capacity, which you have not turned to your advantage.
The way you write shows you have a need for other people to like and admire you, and yet you tend to be critical of yourself.
It seems to me that while While you have some personal weaknesses you are generally able to compensate for them.
This reprint of Johanna Budwig’s original, November 1959 lecture is well worth a careful read. But I found it tough going because, at least in the beginning, it entangles her useful and interesting historical findings and ideas with an attack on the food-processing industry of the day, for its harmful preservatives and additives. She’s gone, now, but I would have loved to see her produce an update, based on what we have learned about metabolism, cell biology and molecular biology, up to the time of her death in 2003. I deducted one star for the “entanglement” and another star because it is out of date. But she is still one of my heroes.
Rating: 3 / 5